<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Week Woman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weekwoman.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>A Pox on the Patriarchy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:15:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BBC Sexism Strikes Back by BBC Sexism Strikes Back &#124; Mitherings from Morningside</title>
		<link>http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/bbc-sexism-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BBC Sexism Strikes Back &#124; Mitherings from Morningside]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/?p=1236#comment-2785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] BBC Sexism Strikes Back. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] BBC Sexism Strikes Back. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BBC Sexism Strikes Back by mark</title>
		<link>http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/2013/05/17/bbc-sexism-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-2784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/?p=1236#comment-2784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree completely.  You just know that the underlying patriarchal perspective is the basis of this, and no one questions it&#039;s validity or not because it is so deeply entrenched.  On our side of the pond it is the same, perhaps even more so.

I do think that the only way to even begin to make equality inroads will be a visual media campaign that shows men doing traditionally female roles, behaviors, customs, whatever, and being shown in a positive light, not that of the fool, AND being verbally praised for it by men and specifically women for doing so.  That will cause a shift in thinking.

Without such positive reinforcement that female and their socially accepted behaviors are not silly and not on par with men, that they are completely ok to be emulated as being valid, one will never get though the unconscious acceptance of the current viewpoint.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely.  You just know that the underlying patriarchal perspective is the basis of this, and no one questions it&#8217;s validity or not because it is so deeply entrenched.  On our side of the pond it is the same, perhaps even more so.</p>
<p>I do think that the only way to even begin to make equality inroads will be a visual media campaign that shows men doing traditionally female roles, behaviors, customs, whatever, and being shown in a positive light, not that of the fool, AND being verbally praised for it by men and specifically women for doing so.  That will cause a shift in thinking.</p>
<p>Without such positive reinforcement that female and their socially accepted behaviors are not silly and not on par with men, that they are completely ok to be emulated as being valid, one will never get though the unconscious acceptance of the current viewpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Her-Story by Week Woman</title>
		<link>http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/her-story/comment-page-1/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Week Woman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/?page_id=2#comment-2781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks! I don&#039;t have time to post as much as I&#039;d like anymore, but hopefully will start up again in a few months :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks! I don&#8217;t have time to post as much as I&#8217;d like anymore, but hopefully will start up again in a few months <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Her-Story by Week Woman</title>
		<link>http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/her-story/comment-page-1/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Week Woman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 11:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/?page_id=2#comment-2779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d rather they didn&#039;t link certain behaviour with being male to be honest. That&#039;s the problem - that&#039;s where the binary lies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather they didn&#8217;t link certain behaviour with being male to be honest. That&#8217;s the problem &#8211; that&#8217;s where the binary lies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Henry V, All-Male Casts, and Gender Colonialism by traslochi-casa</title>
		<link>http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/2012/07/20/henry-v-all-male-casts-and-gender-colonialism/comment-page-1/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[traslochi-casa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 22:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/?p=557#comment-2778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grazie per il vostro articolo, mi sembra molto utile, proverò senz’altro a sperimentare quanto avete indicato… c&#8217;è solo una cosa di cui vorrei parlare più approfonditamente, ho scritto una mail al vostro indirizzo al riguardo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The No-Feminist Zone: Game Of Thrones by Nicole</title>
		<link>http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/2013/01/19/the-no-feminist-zone-game-of-thrones/comment-page-1/#comment-2767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicole]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 03:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/?p=1164#comment-2767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m so glad I came across your post. I thought I was the only one who even noticed the undercurrent in this series. I had to stop watching part way through the first season, because it was too much. It&#039;s an enthralling show, with lots of intrigue and beautiful sets and interesting characters, but the portrayal of women, and the language the men use when referring to women, the blatant sexualising of them is so abhorrent and obvious I don&#039;t understand why more people don&#039;t see it. Not all the women are portrayed as sexual objects but a lot of them are, and despite the shows popularity (including many female fans) I feel the more discussion about WHY this is so popular and accepted and normalised the better. Good job on calling it out!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so glad I came across your post. I thought I was the only one who even noticed the undercurrent in this series. I had to stop watching part way through the first season, because it was too much. It&#8217;s an enthralling show, with lots of intrigue and beautiful sets and interesting characters, but the portrayal of women, and the language the men use when referring to women, the blatant sexualising of them is so abhorrent and obvious I don&#8217;t understand why more people don&#8217;t see it. Not all the women are portrayed as sexual objects but a lot of them are, and despite the shows popularity (including many female fans) I feel the more discussion about WHY this is so popular and accepted and normalised the better. Good job on calling it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The No-Feminist Zone: Game Of Thrones by Penelope</title>
		<link>http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/2013/01/19/the-no-feminist-zone-game-of-thrones/comment-page-1/#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Penelope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/?p=1164#comment-2761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have not read the GoT books and I only saw the first episode (bought the first season because I&#039;ve heard so many great things about the series...oops), and by the end of the episode I was overwhelmed and revolted by the production&#039;s misogyny. The producers are, of course, free to use rape, the gross subjugation of women, and depictions of extraordinary savagery as themes of entertainment (I assume they consider their GoT series to be entertainment), and &quot;we&quot; are free to reject their production as the pathetic and yet despicable piece of crap it is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not read the GoT books and I only saw the first episode (bought the first season because I&#8217;ve heard so many great things about the series&#8230;oops), and by the end of the episode I was overwhelmed and revolted by the production&#8217;s misogyny. The producers are, of course, free to use rape, the gross subjugation of women, and depictions of extraordinary savagery as themes of entertainment (I assume they consider their GoT series to be entertainment), and &#8220;we&#8221; are free to reject their production as the pathetic and yet despicable piece of crap it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Her-Story by azblue</title>
		<link>http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/her-story/comment-page-1/#comment-2760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[azblue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 03:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/?page_id=2#comment-2760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well- since i&#039;m more of a minimalist feminist myself- I rejoice that some website read you as &#039;male&#039;. We are ALL humans- are we not ? As someone who identifies as genderqueer (somewhere in between female and male)- I like to hope the gender binary can be stretched!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well- since i&#8217;m more of a minimalist feminist myself- I rejoice that some website read you as &#8216;male&#8217;. We are ALL humans- are we not ? As someone who identifies as genderqueer (somewhere in between female and male)- I like to hope the gender binary can be stretched!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Vindication of the Representation of Women by Bank of England&#8217;s sexism to women employees &#124; Dear Kitty. Some blog</title>
		<link>http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/2013/04/27/a-vindication-of-the-representation-of-women/comment-page-1/#comment-2742</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bank of England&#8217;s sexism to women employees &#124; Dear Kitty. Some blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 22:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/?p=1228#comment-2742</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A Vindication of the Representation of Women (weekwoman.wordpress.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Vindication of the Representation of Women (weekwoman.wordpress.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The No-Feminist Zone: Game Of Thrones by elby</title>
		<link>http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/2013/01/19/the-no-feminist-zone-game-of-thrones/comment-page-1/#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 22:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weekwoman.wordpress.com/?p=1164#comment-2710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now reading the third book in the GoT series, still enjoying it as well as the TV series so far (although the rape culture is starting to wear), but I&#039;m beginning to wonder if I&#039;m seeing some of GRRM&#039;s rape&#039;s fantasies played out through these works and it&#039;s starting to bug me. 


Rape of women is such a given in his societies...such a mundane reality.  &quot;Everyone&quot; seems to do it or accept it being done, except notably some women never seem to get raped.  Kings rape, knights rape, soldiers rape, townspeople rape, wildings rape.  Even brothers of the night&#039;s watch rape. &quot;Silly women&quot; like the woman Shae serves get raped. Serving wenches, servant girls  and town-girls get raped. Wives get raped. Prostitutes get raped.  Ladies get raped.  Though Danerys may or may not have been raped by Drogo, that all turned out to be rainbows and roses on the show because they she found her sexual inner beast to gain his respect so they could be one hot power couple, so much &quot;in luv.&quot; Since Drogo died, there&#039;s been no rape for Dany even though she&#039;s been wandering a countryside populated by strong and armed men in rape cultures.  Arya doesn&#039;t get raped...in spite of the fact that she too is wandering the countryside basically defenseless while encountering some really bad types.  And what about Brienne, another wandering woman encountering some of the scuzziest scumbags in GoTworld?  There&#039;ve been threats, but somehow it&#039;s never happened?  

Why not?  Why are some of Martin&#039;s women raped but not others?  Does Martin think some women deserve to be raped while finding others above the practice? Are &quot;traditional women&quot; in his world more worthy of being terribly used as plot incidentals?  Does he think the adoption by women in his world of what he perceives to be male characteristics of power and strength such as army leading or joining, throne seeking, power grabbing, statesmanship wielding, swordsmanship proficiency or mixed martial arts studies elevates these women above victimization?  Are women he perceives to be &quot;strong&quot; immune from his rape culture? Does he purposefully protect some of his women from victimization because he wouldn&#039;t respect them if they&#039;d ever actually been &quot;be-soiled?&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now reading the third book in the GoT series, still enjoying it as well as the TV series so far (although the rape culture is starting to wear), but I&#8217;m beginning to wonder if I&#8217;m seeing some of GRRM&#8217;s rape&#8217;s fantasies played out through these works and it&#8217;s starting to bug me. </p>
<p>Rape of women is such a given in his societies&#8230;such a mundane reality.  &#8220;Everyone&#8221; seems to do it or accept it being done, except notably some women never seem to get raped.  Kings rape, knights rape, soldiers rape, townspeople rape, wildings rape.  Even brothers of the night&#8217;s watch rape. &#8220;Silly women&#8221; like the woman Shae serves get raped. Serving wenches, servant girls  and town-girls get raped. Wives get raped. Prostitutes get raped.  Ladies get raped.  Though Danerys may or may not have been raped by Drogo, that all turned out to be rainbows and roses on the show because they she found her sexual inner beast to gain his respect so they could be one hot power couple, so much &#8220;in luv.&#8221; Since Drogo died, there&#8217;s been no rape for Dany even though she&#8217;s been wandering a countryside populated by strong and armed men in rape cultures.  Arya doesn&#8217;t get raped&#8230;in spite of the fact that she too is wandering the countryside basically defenseless while encountering some really bad types.  And what about Brienne, another wandering woman encountering some of the scuzziest scumbags in GoTworld?  There&#8217;ve been threats, but somehow it&#8217;s never happened?  </p>
<p>Why not?  Why are some of Martin&#8217;s women raped but not others?  Does Martin think some women deserve to be raped while finding others above the practice? Are &#8220;traditional women&#8221; in his world more worthy of being terribly used as plot incidentals?  Does he think the adoption by women in his world of what he perceives to be male characteristics of power and strength such as army leading or joining, throne seeking, power grabbing, statesmanship wielding, swordsmanship proficiency or mixed martial arts studies elevates these women above victimization?  Are women he perceives to be &#8220;strong&#8221; immune from his rape culture? Does he purposefully protect some of his women from victimization because he wouldn&#8217;t respect them if they&#8217;d ever actually been &#8220;be-soiled?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
